Why Go Back to the Moon When We Already Crashed into Its Eye in George Méliès “A Trip to the Moon”?
Are our resources best used on returning to the moon, a place explored over 120 years ago by a team of astronomers with huge beards and wizard hats?
Are our resources best used on returning to the moon, a place explored over 120 years ago by a team of astronomers with huge beards and wizard hats?
Instead of the dangerous, unethical practice of cloning once-extinct dinosaurs, our exhibits are human clones who pretend to be dinosaurs.
The study ended after the cone of peach ripple divorced its husband on the grounds that he was having an affair with a strawberry cheesecake.
Relativity is abstract, I know. Let’s give it some specificity, to see if we can make it more accessible for you.
Wow, coral, fish, AND crabs—sounds biodiverse as hell. Whatcha gonna call it? The… “sunlight zone”?
1851: As railroads begin crisscrossing the nation, NASA constructs its own line of over 300 feet of railroad track going straight upward.
People I trusted to think through issues started quoting slogans I didn’t understand. “The dead are better off remaining dead,” they would say.
I do not rattle off these projections to inspire fear in the public. But we can no longer expect that IP extracted through traditional processes.
Oh. You're hung up on the "no pants" thing. Uh, look, time travel is an imprecise science.
Who is the real monster here? The tentacled creature lurking in the vapor outside… or were you all the real monster this whole time?
Presidents are coming along nicely. I watched as a tiny Grover Cleveland push, push, pushed his way out of a synthetic eggshell.
I'm advancing science entire centuries without bumping into any serious questions of morality and ethics. How unbelievable is that?