Thursday, July 12, 2007

Brave New Chore

When I was in high school I read Brave New World. A guy named Aldous Huxley wrote it. And he did a good job. For those of you who’ve never read it, the book basically tells the story of a utopian society in which people are built on assembly lines. These people have their destinies and livelihoods planned out for them. They have no parents or family units and essentially live to have sex, watch movies and use drugs (when not working). Some are built to run the world, others are built to clean it, and there are different levels in between.

When I was in college, I was once again assigned that book. (Side note: how awesome was it when a teacher would assign you a book that you already read? It was like being handed an A.) So I became pretty familiar with Brave New World as a result of public education.

After I graduated college, I went to Europe to stay with Then-Girlfriend, who was (and probably still is) German. And, oddly enough, one of her teachers assigned her that book. And, even odder still, her teacher asked me if I would come in and help teach the class. Her teacher said that because I was a native speaker of the land from whence the book came, my input would be valuable. I highly doubted that, but I went anyway.

One of the discussion questions in this class was actually a discussion question that I had been given in America, which didn’t really surprise me. The resulting discussion, however, shocked me.

The teacher asked, “Do you think the society in Brave New World was a good one, and why?”

And every one of these German students responded that yes, the society in Brave New World was a good one because every person was taken care of and was relatively happy and that was what was most important.

I couldn’t believe my ears.

The teacher saw the shock on my face and asked me to respond to the question.

“It’s a horrible society,” I said (at this point, Then-Girlfriend became red with the embarrassment her Neanderthal American boyfriend was causing). “They have no families, no love, no art—none of the things that make life matter. They’re not even free to choose how they live or what they do for a living. It’s an assigned life. And happy or not, they lack souls because of it.”

The class looked at me as if I was made of Laffy Taffy until the teacher responded, “I hear that is a very American response to this novel. But we Germans tend to recognize the importance of a system that works well.”

“In America,” I said. “We don’t really like being told what to do.”

A few days later, I asked Then-Girlfriend if she really thought that such a society would be a good one in which to live. Her response: “Yes. I think most people would rather not be burdened with the freedoms that you love so much. For many people, freedom is a chore.”

Damn socialists. They just don’t get it.

On July 12, 2007 2:31 PM, Anonymous Logan said...

I suppose the cultural difference in beliefs stems from disparity over what the purpose of being alive is. If we exist just to procreate and further our species then perhaps the Germans are right. I wonder what percentage of our American population which just lives to work and watch tv would appreciate that socialist way of life.
Of course the alternative argument is which offers a better quality of life. I just read Player Piano a couple months ago and one of the themes was that people need to feel creative and productive in their struggle for survival in order for them to feel satisfied with their lives.
On the other hand, all I think that really does is sidetrack people from their pointless lives and inevitable death. Like the donkey chasing the carrot on the string, pursuing and exercising freedom is really just another distraction unless there is some higher purpose (this is where religion comes in). Still, I think for most people religion is just a carrot of its own.
All in all though, I would much rather have the freedom to make myself miserable instead of having someone else do it for me.

 
On July 12, 2007 8:06 PM, Blogger The Dude said...

Why, Nathan, I believe this is one of two posts (the other being the rat post) that I completely agree with you on.

You're improving.

 
On July 12, 2007 9:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Read Huxley's Island. It's his counterpoint to Brave New World and a good picture of a TRUE utopian society...

 
On July 13, 2007 3:22 PM, Anonymous Grandpa Tom said...

Wow. Unreal. Hitler really did a thing to them. But no wonder! No wonder they just let the holocaust happen. Sheeple! Now then, did you ever figure out why the Germans like scat porn? That's a bigger mystery!

 
On July 14, 2007 2:10 PM, Anonymous faith said...

That would be all well and good, were Huxley's novel not a critique of American laissez-faire capitalism.

Recall that Henry Ford was their messianic figure of the state. The point is that advertising and commercialism, when run amuck, will lead us down the road to mind-control and authoritarianism. And given the uncritical knee-jerk rhetoric of "freedom" bantered about on this site, I think many of your readers are not too far from it themselves.

 
On July 14, 2007 2:34 PM, Blogger Nathan said...

None of that has anything to do with what I was trying to say, Faith. I'm not a philosopher, I'm just a storyteller, but if I was trying to say anything with this piece, it is that the power to be an individual and have individual freedom USED to be and SHOULD be the most important blessing given by America.

I think capitalism is fine. And I think you confuse capitalism with corporatism. A free market allows for open competition and allows all to benefit. It is when corporations influence the government (like nowadays) that we have a problem. Socialism allows for tyranny, in my opinion, because it creates a power vacuum. A free market does not.

 

Post a Comment