KC vs. Bumper Sticker Logic: Dismembering Your Member
I have a saying, "Opinions are like exes. Everyone has them, and they're all retarded and psychotic."
I'm driving more since I've moved to Colorado, thus I'm seeing more bumper stickers. Generally I don't care if you're advertising what kind of stereo is in your car, your favorite shitty football team or where you went to high school. I really, really just don't give a damn.
And it's not even the political messages that annoy me. I'll go ahead and agree that George W. Bush was the worst president of the century...if you agree that Barrack Hussein Obama is the second worst. But I digress.
On my daily trip to the grocery store I saw a Subaru (why does it always have to be a Subaru—who are these rejects?) with these messages:

Now I don't have children, nor do I care to look at other dudes' dongs. I like women. I've been with a few handfuls of them, and never ONCE has a girl taken off my pants and said, "Oh this is as gross as shit. You don't have a foreskin!" My special ladyfriends get mad enough when I don't shave The Twins (that's what I call my balls—which is yet another euphemism for testicles).
On the real other hand, I know a lot of ladies (and nearly all of my gay dude friends) that are generally freaked out by the uncut version of a "man's movie."
Oddly enough, I've seen these anti-circumcision stickers on cars with Pro-Choice stickers. So it's okay to stuff a baby in a Cuisinart but not snip off part of his peen-peen? Now, I'll not get into that discussion, because once again, I don't care.
Now I suppose whatever hippie lady's argument is that an infant boy doesn't choose to have part of his weiner cut off, so you're violating his rights. Here's my argument: "So what?"
Did you ask little baby Moonstone if he wants to speak English? Eat canned turnips or whatever they make baby food out of? Go to school? No. There are just things that you do for your kid. Or don't do. So fuck his little baby feelings.
I don't remember how badly it hurt when the doctor chopped up my then baby-sized KC Junior (that's my penis) but I can imagine it was fucking painful as hell. And that's the point, I don't remember, soooooo who cares? However, I do remember how awesome every blowjob I've ever received feels. And seriously people, that's all that really matters.
If I could get a second procedure done that hurt even more, but made me enjoy getting knobbers even more, I'd fucking get two of them.
So there you go hippie. Paste your next bumper sticker over your eyes and drive really fast into a tree. Because circumcision is awesome and so are blowjobs. I win. Flawless Victory.










9 Comments
I agree, chop the floppy skin off!!
I'm a chick, and I definately enjoy going down more on the stick when there's no turtle neck....it's usually cleaner!
I'll assume that you're implying that getting circumcisions increases your chances of getting a blowjob AT ALL (by not grossing out chicks), thus it's beneficial. Because surely you're aware that the sensitivity (and I'm assuming pleasure) is greater for those still WITH foreskin. Of course, I don't know how exactly they're measuring these comparisons, except maybe on dudes who had foreskin, then got circumcised later in life (because they weren't getting blowjobs?).
Court, you may be the boss, but this isn't up for debate. I like getting blowjobs, and that's basically the end of discussion. Unless you can think of better words for "like blowjobs a lot."
Casey,
Word! Us circumcised fellers have to have each other's back (so to speak)- we're always told that our not-so-leetle-friends are insensitive and unnatural; As a Gay guy who had the chop as a larval queen I haven't had any complaints from the guys I've played "Mulder & Krycek go deep undercover" games with- I'm not exactly Hugh Heffner, but I've been with several men, only one of whom was uncut- and he was a dud in the sack!
btw- Unless you can think of better words for "like blowjobs a lot."
-"I am male"?!
Ha! I'm assuming said hippy lady with the bumper sticker is concentrating on the "aesthetic" or "religious" reasons for circumcision.
So what about the case of a baby boy with an infection who was told by the doctor (who clearly couldn't see the infection even though it was obvious from a distance to non-medical personnel) that any circumcision would need to be done by a rabbi, because it was a religious choice!
Had the baby boy's mother not been a) Catholic and b) incredibly headstrong, my boyfriend's little general would've been so inflamed it would have had to be removed.
Needless to say our sex life is incredible!
How can you play with your penis if you don't have a foreskin? That's like playing a trumpet that doesn't have any keys, or an X-Box with only one game.
I've never heard a single chick complain. And I've never hooked up with a chick without getting a bj.
Plus I can masturbate without lube. So shove it.
I'm sorry, but foreskin is definitely fun to play with.
An Israeli woman (and drill instructor) told me that in the Israeli army every soldier is given a percentage number indicating how complete of a soldier they are.
For example, if you are color blind you are reduced to
87%
The women all start at 100% and the men all start at 97%
3%......apparently that is what is lost in the process.
So what have we learned from this?
Gavin you may need to make a pilgrimage to the land of HOLY SHIT! ;-P
I'm not pro-abortion - far from it - but my guess is that the reason "pro-choice" people have anti-infant-circumcision stickers on their cars is because just as they believe in "her body, her choice" they also believe in "his body, his choice" and in this case there is no other person's life (or even potential life) that hangs in the balance with this choice. There is no reason to not wait until a boy is old enough to make the decision for himself. The fact that very few intact men in other parts of the world choose this for themselves speaks volumes about the happiness and health of men who were allowed to choose for themselves.
I actually find it much more ironic that many "pro-life" folks seek to protect babies before they are born and yet once they're born, it's just fine and dandy to amputate a perfectly healthy part of their perfectly healthy newborn baby's body - generally without adequate or sometimes even *any* pain relief. Now where's the logic in that?
Another issue you completely ignored is that, naturally, women who have only been with circumcised guys will prefer circumcised penises. Why would they prefer something they've never seen or experienced personally? However, every single friend (male and female) I have who has experienced both circumcised and intact (not circumcised) penises has assured me that I'm not missing out on anything by never having been with a circumcised guy and they would know!
For many excellent studies about infant circumcision and the alleged benefits vs. the risks, I highly recommend this site:
http://cirp.org
No medical association in the world recommends routine infant circumcision which leaves us only with cosmetic reasons and cosmetic surgery on a perfectly healthy and normal body part of a non-consenting person should not be legal, IMO.
Post new comment