Core to the Core
Posted June 8th, 2007 by Nathan DeGraaf
"The sooner we come home the better."
Aaaaaa?Ron Paul (on the Iraq War), New Hampshire Primaries
Look, I know His Coreness Ron Paul has about a zero point seven chance of getting nominated for President of our Corporate Owned Country. I understand this. And I also know that The Nate Way is very much like an internet version of a bar, which means that though we can occasionally get deep here, we should probably stray from politics and religion. I understand all this, and yet I will not stop dedicating my Fridays to keeping y'all updated on Mr. Core's most recent week, and he had a busy one, starting with a spot on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart.
If you hate politics (specifically those regarding freedom), quit reading here and check out Gaudio's blog or something.
A few notes on Paul's appearance there before we get to the actual issues and the actual words he actually said (which is actually the most important thing about any actual candidate but actually doesn't matter all that much in the US because we actually hate ugly people over here or something).

Ron Paul is kind of kooky looking. I can't say it any better than that. He is kind of fragile looking and he sounds kind of like a wealthy, well-educated, polite grandfather who dishes out advice to his small town family over ice cream sundaes after church. He doesn't have that leadership machismo and that's a bummer. Still, I think he looks about as tough as George Bush Senior, and George the First got a lil' regime hold so who knows?
Anyway, on The Daily Show, Ron Paul made it clear that he was against interventionist policy, which in simple terms, means he doesn't think we should police the world. He also stated that he thinks we should follow the constitution. All in all, it was a decent interview. His points were accepted by Jon, which basically means that Paul probably picked up some of the 18-30 demographic on Monday. Never hurts.
Then, two days after his appearance on The Daily Show, His Coreness participated in the republican debates where he stated that the biggest moral dilemma facing our country is our belief that starting wars is a good idea. Meanwhile, his fellow Republicans babbled on about abortion, Christianity and a whole bunch of other issues that, though certainly moral, do not affect America as a whole because said issues have nothing to do with the actual political fabric of our country. While his fellow party members spoke about their personal lives, how they voted in recent decisions and (I believe) their religious beliefs, Paul spoke about individual rights, about ending the war in Iraq immediately and about what it means to have freedom.
It was freaking poetry, even if Wolf Blitzer didn't let Mr. Core talk enough (in my opinion).
In regards to gay rights, His Coreness made it very clear that we do not get our rights from being in groups. There is no such thing as gay rights, or minority rights, or women's rights? Our rights are inalienable and individual to us, according to Paul. Grouping people together helps no one. In my opinion, that's what it means to be free. The sooner we understand that we all deserve individual freedom, the sooner we'll actually be free.
Oh, and not for nothing, but recent reports show that Ron Paul has raised over three million dollars for his candidacy in the last thirty days, putting him behind only Giuliani and Romney (and ahead of McCain) in terms of funds raised by republicans.
Which means that there are still some people out there who believe in freedom.
Now, if only a few of those people were in charge of steering this diesel-run ship?
Aaaaaa?Ron Paul (on the Iraq War), New Hampshire Primaries
Look, I know His Coreness Ron Paul has about a zero point seven chance of getting nominated for President of our Corporate Owned Country. I understand this. And I also know that The Nate Way is very much like an internet version of a bar, which means that though we can occasionally get deep here, we should probably stray from politics and religion. I understand all this, and yet I will not stop dedicating my Fridays to keeping y'all updated on Mr. Core's most recent week, and he had a busy one, starting with a spot on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart.
If you hate politics (specifically those regarding freedom), quit reading here and check out Gaudio's blog or something.
A few notes on Paul's appearance there before we get to the actual issues and the actual words he actually said (which is actually the most important thing about any actual candidate but actually doesn't matter all that much in the US because we actually hate ugly people over here or something).

Ron Paul is kind of kooky looking. I can't say it any better than that. He is kind of fragile looking and he sounds kind of like a wealthy, well-educated, polite grandfather who dishes out advice to his small town family over ice cream sundaes after church. He doesn't have that leadership machismo and that's a bummer. Still, I think he looks about as tough as George Bush Senior, and George the First got a lil' regime hold so who knows?
Anyway, on The Daily Show, Ron Paul made it clear that he was against interventionist policy, which in simple terms, means he doesn't think we should police the world. He also stated that he thinks we should follow the constitution. All in all, it was a decent interview. His points were accepted by Jon, which basically means that Paul probably picked up some of the 18-30 demographic on Monday. Never hurts.
Then, two days after his appearance on The Daily Show, His Coreness participated in the republican debates where he stated that the biggest moral dilemma facing our country is our belief that starting wars is a good idea. Meanwhile, his fellow Republicans babbled on about abortion, Christianity and a whole bunch of other issues that, though certainly moral, do not affect America as a whole because said issues have nothing to do with the actual political fabric of our country. While his fellow party members spoke about their personal lives, how they voted in recent decisions and (I believe) their religious beliefs, Paul spoke about individual rights, about ending the war in Iraq immediately and about what it means to have freedom.
It was freaking poetry, even if Wolf Blitzer didn't let Mr. Core talk enough (in my opinion).
In regards to gay rights, His Coreness made it very clear that we do not get our rights from being in groups. There is no such thing as gay rights, or minority rights, or women's rights? Our rights are inalienable and individual to us, according to Paul. Grouping people together helps no one. In my opinion, that's what it means to be free. The sooner we understand that we all deserve individual freedom, the sooner we'll actually be free.
Oh, and not for nothing, but recent reports show that Ron Paul has raised over three million dollars for his candidacy in the last thirty days, putting him behind only Giuliani and Romney (and ahead of McCain) in terms of funds raised by republicans.
Which means that there are still some people out there who believe in freedom.
Now, if only a few of those people were in charge of steering this diesel-run ship?
Labels: ron_paul







8 Comments
Well, he's better than Hilary Clinton or Obama "Anti-Christ" Barack.
These posts actually make me want to vote for Paul. I'm not really into politics, but I suppose I should be an educated voter for my first Presidential election.
In the past, I agreed that we should not "police the world." In fact, I was dead set against it.
Then I started seriously studying history.
In WWI, we did not intercede until the letter to Mexico, during Germany tried to convince Mexico to invade the USA in order to draw attention away from what was happening in Europe. I'm pretty sure there was more to it than that, but I'm tired. Anyway, we join in, stalemate ends, la la la.
We pretty much ignore the world for another 20 or so years. WWII. Hitler is appeased, then he's like "fuck this" and invades Poland. Then Japan attacks Pearl Harbor (which, if ever given the chance, everyone should visit) and the US is in the war.
German WWI vet says to his soldier son, "America is in the war now. It is lost for you."
After WWII the USA realizes that hey, we better make sure this Hitler shit doesn't happen again. Let's start the UN.
US rebuilds German & Japanese economy. We do good. Countries ask for help. We help.
Then they start bitching that we help too much. Then something bad happens and they bitch that we don't do enough. (Darfur, anyone? )
I like this guy. I do. I just don't think he's going to be able to fix much. The whole "checks and balances" thing, ya know? We're pretty much screwed for a little while.
As for Iraq, I never wanted to go. But we're there. And, despite what the media says (and I base this on discussions I've personally had with several soldiers who've spent 1-2 tours there, a lot of Iraqis want us there. Right now, it's a Catch-22. We stay, people die. We leave, people die.
And I say this with my boyfriend (we're actually engaged, I just despise the "f" word) heading over in less than a month. We have to stay. Give the Iraqis a firm pull out date. Tell them we'll stay until then, but they gotta get their shit together. Great Britain did it in Israel. We can do it here.
In Iraq, I think they'd rather be alive then free.
Dumb bastards.
I'd rather be free than alive.
'Course, I really am a dumb bastard. So take that how you will.
wow ron has 3 mill to spend on election... last time i checked his numbers, i think i had more to spend on the election lol... good to know others r donating their funds and time.
Keep it up Nate, keep the people informed about his coreness.
Long winded anonymous,
Ask yourself this question. What citizens have been occupied by us that wanted to be occupied by us? And who has ever thanked us for our bombs?
Wait. Sorry. That's too questions.
anonymous, i think your point about israel was wonderful because we all know how well israel has been doing since the british left what with the fact that its the mecca of peace and non-violence.
and as a history major, Japan attacked Pearl harbor because they were sick of the US meddling with thier internal and foreign affairs and basically being dicks not because they were mad we weren't paying enough attention to the rest of the world
Post new comment