Nate Questions His Way, So Do I
Posted July 16th, 2008 by Casey Freeman
This is my weekly Q&A where I ask your deepest and darkest secrets. Post your answers as comments.
Now that famed Nathan DeGraaf is taking a sabbatical from PIC, what are you "The Readers" looking forward to from us – “The other writers?” Please don’t tell me you’re going to quit coming to the site. Seriously, how can we fill the void? We’re here for you…and because we’re bored and narcissistic.
Do you think you’ll ever get sick of jokes about boners, misogyny, drinking, sexing and farts?
What do you like best about PIC 2.0? Least?
And seriously, buy Nate's book for yourself, your friends and your enemies. Maybe if his sales spike he'll change his decision.








10 Comments
no one can do better then nate. track him down, beg him to rethink his decisions. seriously. but you're a pretty close second. if you leave, screw it, I'M not going to read anymore...and possibly sue.
but, if you could post some more interesting crap, that's ok too. i'll waste my life reading either way.
no, i will not get sick of said subjects.ever.
Put Paul Frank on mushrooms and make him go to random concerts and write down his experiences. Seriously.
The worst part of PIC 2.0 is the incessant reference to PIC 2.0. It's just PIC dude, just PIC. A new site layout with more shineys and sparklies doesn't change the whole concept or anything. Just PIC.
I'll miss Nate's writing, but I don't think anybody needs to fill the void. He had his thing, and the other writers have their things. Maybe someday he'll be back with a new thing. Until then, the other writers are doing fine.
Absolutely not.
It's not really a layout thing, but since 2.0 started I've enjoyed all of the non-columnist articles that have been submitted. My least favorite is the nicknames. I haven't seen a funny one yet.
KC, you're my favorite new writer to the site. With Nate gone, and so many of the other older writers MIA, you have to put up a big game. Paul Frank can be funny, but his style of comedy is too strained at mass produced. So get to posting KC, and tell Nate to get his ass back here.
If I hear the fucking 2.0 term once more I'm going to swear off any site that mentions it. Christ, enough with the moniker!
kc- Just start writing, bro. You're funniest when you aren't TRYING to be funny. 2.0 is so last year.
You know, other writers dissapeared from the site for months at a time without even saying anything. I didn't quit. I'll be back. I'm just on vacation
Ok, no more 2.0 jokes from me. Ever.
Thanks for all the kind words Lys, TDHurst and everybody. Make sure to give all the proper love to everybody else on the site.
Now I have to try to make sure I'm trying not to be funny to be funny. This shit is complicated.
What interesting crap do you guys want me to post?
Not Verified Nate, enjoy the break. You definitely deserve it and we all understand your reasons. It has to be some consolation that when you say you're leaving people beg you not to.
Once again, buy Nate's book! And if you really want to, send Paul Frank some mushrooms, concert tickets and a tape recorder.
"Anonymous (not verified)" I am too Anonymous! I swear! This "not verified" crap is so not true!
No way! I have been Anonymous since '97 bro! If anyone is anonymous it's me, and I should know!
Post new comment