The Real "Truth" Behind These Lies

I want to have a threesome with you and Lola.

While DHAW watches and critiques.

Oh Roxy...honey, are you sure you don't need more sleep?? Really - where do you come up with this stuff??? Maybe a beer...or maybe a little less beer?? Who knows. Either way - you make me laugh and ponder life; all the while in utter amazement of your imagination.

Hahaha, Roxy, or should i say Beatrice, you are way to funny. Thank you so much for starting to write for PIC, it makes my time wasting that much better.

is it bad that my first reaction was, "awww that's so cute"? great pic and great post!

I wasn't suggesting that picture was of someone else. I was merely recommending that you stop referring to your own sex life or sexual preference as if anyone less perceptive than Helen Keller herself would fancy that bizarre "look" you have going on, which I think suggests either an extra chromosome or some severe inbreeding.
As always, just trying to help.

Perhaps I meant to say "more perceptive than Helen Keller." If only I had an editor to fix my typos (which in your case is the equivalent of painting a turd--it may hide some of the initial glaring offensiveness, but really it's still just a steaming log).

Wait...you mean that you figured out that then picture on R.Supa's blog was actually her? Honestly, give yourself four stars, you've earned them.

For the record, though, since Helen Keller is dead, her perceptiveness is about on the level of her peers now. She's no less perceptive than Charles de Gaulle or King James II (both of whom were supposed to have had quite excellent eyesight.)*

Thanks for the help, but it seems that at least one person fancies it. Well, that or Janoy is just a huge e-slut.

Seriously, though, R-Money, what is the deal with having a "look"? Who has those anymore? I personally prefer people whose faces just consist of one big question mark.

DHAW, I now demand a picture of you. If you're shy, you can just draw one in M.S. paint. Nobody will notice the difference.

Also trying to help,

X

*I have no way of knowing whether these are true or not.

Well if you can't seem to understand that I was referring to Helen Keller's perceptiveness when she was ALIVE, then really my statement encompasses ALL living creatures, who, according to you, have more perception than a dead Helen Keller. Thusly, no single human creature can seem to find him (or her) self attracted to this offspring of what I assume are brother and sister.

The fact that a virtually anonymous poster has expressed interest in her doesn't mean much at all. After all, the mere fact that this 47-chromosome-possessing author even exsts suggests that ugly people can have sex. Don't you know hyperbole when you read it?

And by the way...pointing out insignificant or even irrelevant "errors" as a means of responding to my posts suggests to me that you have no REAL argument with my posts. None that you have the mental capacity to voice, anyway.

You want me to respond to your argument? I would love to, except you haven't really made a valid one.

Do you understand the concept of argumentum ad hominem, and why it's kind of ridiculous to argue any point that's been set up along those grounds? Especially when the person uses such colorful "hyperbole"? If you have any salient points on the actual quality of the writing, I'd be more than happy to prove you wrong (or even admit that I was), but seeing as all you've done is spew nonsense verbiage, I don't really have to offer much in the way of counterargument, savvy?

If you want to avoid coming off as a ridiculous tool, it's best to avoid egregious errors when you're being so caustic and bitter.

Besides, Helen Keller is a trite and cliche punchline these days anyway. I mean come on, you're the Dickhead of THE YEAR, you've got to be better than that.

Right?

bahaha...fags. nice comeback. i bet you really wore out your thesaurus on that one.
If you can't respond to what I said then what exactly is the point of posting? I'm sure if you keep defending ol' cumpdumpster up there, one day she might become your first friend.

I'm sorry, I should have put this in terms you could understand:

You're an ugly queerbag you have no friends fagboy. If you took the dick out of your ass sometimes, maybe your mom would let you come out of the basement sometimes and play with the other 40 year old virgins. Then you could have a friend too.

Once again, your response left much to be desired. Most of the things I write on here are at least a little bit based on fact or observation. The reason I said "fags" was because our friend Down Syndrome wrote an article blasting a post that wasn't even written by yours truly.
You, however, make the absolutely baseless assumption that I am gay, 40 years old, and ugly. Talk about logical fallacies.
And if my posts are so pointless and nonsensical (sounds like someone is projecting) than why keep posting moronic, pathetic attempts at witty responses?

I would reply to what you've said, but first could you do me a biiig favor? Look up "satire" and "projecting".

It sure is fun being moronic and pathetic though. I wish I had tried this sooner.

I realized you were attempting to satirize me, it was just poorly done because it really wasn't anything like what I wrote. There is a difference between exaggeration and incorrect interpretation.
And the projecting bit...I'm not quite sure where you are mistaken but I will clear the air. Projecting is unconsciously redirecting characteristics that you perceive yourself having onto others.
By the way I personally think you are worse than all kinds of cancer combined for being so mind-numblingly stupid. Your family is due the same result as Cumpdumpster's if you keep this up. Whoever is pulling the strings upstairs HATES retards like you. I wish that crazy Korean at VT had killed you instead of innocent people.

DHA - I'll admit that your moronic ramblings can be amusing, although pointless and uncalled for...it is completely disrespectful and disgraceful to bring up the VT tragedy and wish that on anyone. It really is unfortunate that you feel the need to devote time to putting down others. Your time could be much better spent with a counselor trying to figure out what the hell is wrong with you.

i agree with tillie. completely disrespectful and uncalled for. there was absolutely no reason to bring that up at all.

roxy, i laughed. simple fact and that's good enough for me.

Lovely! So let's examine the projecting part. You've implied that I'm worried about my posts being pointless and nonsensical. Let my assure you that that is quite incorrect. They have a point (to make you look silly) and they make sense (because you are silly). You see how projecting was the wrong word there and something you just tossed in a vain attempt at a comeback?

As far the satire goes, I'm quite glad that you pulled your head out of your ass long enough to peek at a definiton. Kudos! I'm sure then, that you must realize, that I wasn't going for the exact wording so much as the entire idiotic timbre.

Wow, though, that's some compliment. I'm worse than ALL TYPES OF CANCER? There's not really a point in arguing with somebody who's debating style is so clearly finely honed that he can get right to the core of the issue. I'm not even going to address your other claim.

Considering this is Roxy's comment board, I think this has gone on far enough.

-X-, this is not craig's list.

Tillie, I probably don't need more sleep or a beer as much as I need to sleep at the right time. or have more hours in the day. and DHA Winner can't help it. He was born that way.

Janoy, thank you.

Eve, thank you. I was going for "cute."

DHA Winner!, you're my most favorite trolling gimmick commenter ever!

Jackie, thank you.

To both -X- and DHA Winner!, you guys make it really tempting to write stuff for the pure reaction and arguments that you both will have.