Signup for PIC!
Create a member account now to track your comments/submissions, mark your favorites, contact writers, customize your profile and more. It only takes a few seconds here.
Recent Comments
| Author | Comment | Article |
|---|---|---|
| China (not verified) | i love cocaine | How to Be a Drug Dealer |
| Samantha (not verified) | that was awesome. xD | I'm Here for the Gang Bang |
| Anonymous (not verified) | lol thank you man for making | Bored Out of My Mind |
| V (not verified) | one of the best articles | Fixing the Economy: Shoot the Hostage |
| mike yuen ken paahana (not verified) | hahaha i tell all the girls | My First Girlfriend |
Well it's a pretty muddy analysis, but you pretty much nailed it.
If you give 4 years per generation, as that's how long it takes to graduate, it would make sense that in 2 years you'll have two full gens gone by, with number 3 now running the show. Aw hell let's name them.
Founders: marked by classic observational humor.
Branchers: consider them gen X for experimentation and diversification. Notice the distinction between styles, voices, and columns.
Babies: Too early to name. Will they return to a classic mode or defy our generational definition by furthering the branching trend?
This is all subject to change. The founders is a clear group, but what is defined as gen 2 and 3 depends really on where we go from here.
I think about this too much.
