|
Exploiting the Most Out of the Holidays
>>> The Scholarly Tabloid
By staff writer
E. Mike Tuckerson
November 19, 2006
|
Share this article
|
|
|
“Trivial Enlightenment from Beginning to Zen”
Have you ever been hanging with someone only to realize that the best thing
about the relationship was that it really wasn’t much of one? Consider some of
the people you casually hang out with whenever you’re bored, or the ones who
happen to share a class with you. Maybe they’re smart or funny. Maybe they have
an amazing body and a kind and gentle soul…whatever. The thing they all have in
common is that you really have
no emotional obligations to them whatsoever. That’s great news because
‘tis the season to exploit them.
Around this time each year, Americans prepare for the onslaught of the
“holiday season.” Shoppers (read: women) begin their perennial targeting of
bargains and sales, much like a war council on storming Normandy, or K-Fed on
storming the unemployment line. These shoppers seek to ransack the malls and
outlets in search of elusive bargains, while others prepare for a season of
preying upon the emotionally crippling atmosphere of winter.
If it weren’t for the
scattered fragments of broken couples and the shattered dreams of romance,
the holidays would be far too upbeat for the brand of psychological warfare I’m
talking about. With the stress of work or exams mixing with that faint aroma of
depression hovering ever so faintly above the dorm room of every collegian, it’s
no wonder the post-final, pre-flight “home hook-up” odds are in the favor of
anyone with a pulse. While I’m not advocating using people as an emotional
crutch, I am saying that this is certainly the time when it happens the most.
"I'm not looking for a person who embodies something that
I’m lacking in hopes that they compliment me." So, if you’re
lonely and happen to stay awake long enough to remember that cute
guy/girl who lightly flirted with you throughout the semester, ‘tis
the season you’re likely to deck their halls with your holiday
cheer. While I sit this particular game out each season, I figured
I’d put it in writing for the uninitiated. Cheers.
Southern
Discomfort
I was making plans for the next evening after the current one went south,
when the girl I’m with asks, “Do you always have to plan everything?” I tell
her, “No, but it's nice to make plans with people after you've cancelled on
them.” I was referring to making plans with someone whom I cancelled on to be
with The Grand Inquisitor sitting beside me. That particular
interrogation, coupled with her fondness of a friend of mine that she met at a
party, kind of brought to light that I really wasn't what she wanted in a
boyfriend. I wasn't her particular brand of impulsive and thus, I wasn't quite
right. She wasn’t the brightest bulb or even the most effervescent, so I
considered it a draw.
My mind then flashed to the
last couple of women I’ve been with, and I thought about how much both
parties would have preferred someone just a little different. Sometimes
we wanted less sentiment, and sometimes both parties seemed to want someone else
entirely. It became clearer that what we wanted and what we actually found
weren't so much different on the actual level as much as they were different
inside our very minds. Perception trumps reality most of the time, but it
honestly becomes a case of how the packaging that attracts us ultimately leads
at least one person to buyer's remorse.
There's a lot of talk from exes (not just my own) about wanting
someone who is reliable, trust-worthy, open, and honest. They talk
about finding someone who really cares about them and doesn't judge
them. They want someone easy-going yet dependable. The first
question I ask is, “Why should such a person stick with you? Would
you rather *they* be miserable with your lousy ass?” But don’t think
the women I’ve dated were the only delusional ones.
For the record, I chose to date and/or sleep with them, so I’ve got my
own pitfalls there. I guess the difference is that I’m not looking for a
“concept” person. I'm not looking for a person who embodies something that I’m
lacking or something that I neglect in hopes that they compliment me. I can’t
say the same for some of the women I’ve been with. Instead, I'm looking for
someone honest enough to embrace who they are, particularly someone worth being
with who I am.
It’s all a balancing act, from balancing one's introverted/extroverted
tendencies all the way to balancing joint pursuits of personal growth and
individual reflections. I simply can't abide by the fact that someone else
should be brought in to compliment what we feel we are lacking when it comes to
traits like kindness, sincerity, trustworthiness, creativity, or intellect. We
can not expect another to be our “muse” or
our “personal Jesus.” The truth is that unless both people are seeking
personal improvement, neither will be able to obtain much lasting happiness. In
the end, it is a lopsided exchange of faulty expectations and inevitable
time-bombs, the epicenters of which relationships dismantle all too late.
|
Share this article
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
| E. Mike Tuckerson was a senior marketing/legal studies major at Tulane University in New Orleans. Now, hes traveling the country in search of a new school and the true meaning of Christmas. He loves learning about new cultures, discussing various philosophies, and approaching the insufferable point at which he can hold a conversation with anyone about anything. With a variety of humor influences and a wealth of unexpected life experiences behind him, Mike probes into the very reality we share and attempts to pick both brain and heart alike. He once wept because he had no shoes until he met a man who had no feetand laughed through the tears. Just as life is absurd, so are some of the musings of a man comfortable with the search for his place in the world. |
|


RSS Feed
|
|
|